Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jasonhanley's commentslogin

I’ve recently been perplexed by the new policy to charge 25% tariffs on incoming goods from America’s two closest suppliers: Canada and Mexico.

So I decided to put the question to 3 of the most advanced AIs I have access to using their “reasoning” models.


As far as I can tell, the training is still going pretty well.

Once humans learn enough, they are able to start coming up with and evaluating their own ideas.

This ability isn't 100% apparent with current public AI models, but I strongly suspect that this is happening behind the scenes.

Certainly researchers are already using AI extensively to improve AI, and that really has the potential to go exponential.


I just don't buy this at all. I've had no end of circular conversations with AI models because they fundamentally don't understand anything.

No amount of training data will solve this. Intelligence isn't a word prediction game.


I've rarely seen this, mostly get answers correctly, and am able to use it for generation and reasoning. Can you share any link of a chatgpt/gemini conversation where this kind of circular conversation happened?


I agree the multimodal stuff is amazing. I'm seriously impressed with the new Gemini 2.0 family of models and can't wait until the full multimodal capabilities are in general release.

In terms of the HeyGen vid, it's passable, but that was something I literally whipped up in 10 minutes. You can make ones that are much, much better if you invest in creating better training material. The voice and video model in this case only used the one 3-minute source video.

Funny you mention the "people zoo" thing. That's actually part of a sci-fi story I've been trying to write since I was in my teens. Roughed out here: https://youtu.be/2KLdaVs_ugw


Kurt Vonnegut did it first.


You know what's wild? Not ever having heard of him, I can find out who he is and how this relates to the conversation in milliseconds.

For others' benefit:

"Kurt Vonnegut explored themes of humans being observed by extraterrestrial beings in a zoo-like setting in his novel Slaughterhouse-Five. ... While this scenario involves humans being placed in a zoo by aliens, it does not specifically depict artificial intelligence (AI) as the captors. However, Vonnegut did address the impact of automation and machines on human society in his debut novel, Player Piano."

Amazing times we live in. Strange and scary, but also amazing.


Great book. Well worth a read.


I've quit caffeine several times on and off, but overall I think that a small amount of caffeine does more for mental acuity than none at all, even considering sleep quality.

But it's really easy to overdo. And really easy to keep ramping up your dose as your body adjusts.

If you just want to _reduce_ your caffeine intake, I found that the easiest way is to pre-mix different ratios of regular and decaf in a container and use that. You can make 50:50 or 25:75 regular:decaf and easily taper off your intake (especially towards the afternoon/evening) while still enjoying a nice cup of coffee :)


Kicking Horse coffee makes a half-caf blend if you can get your hands on it, I'm sure there are others. You can mix that 1:1 with full caf to make a half-half-caf-half-caf coff


Dare I say there's a mini-movement starting? :D https://www.jasonhanley.com/blog/2018/09/making-websites-eff...

Here's hoping...


If anything, the rants about this are getting better. That's probably a good sign. This rant is at least 10x better than mine from last year :) https://www.jasonhanley.com/blog/2017/08/when-did-software-g...

To the author: I'm with you. Recently rebuilt my website and blog as an experiment in efficiency.


Down here. Hardly news considering it's Twitter :P


I feel like stuff like this is why golang and rust were created.

(edit: Forgot about Rust, sorry!)


I feel like stuff like this is why golang was created.

Or more properly, why Rust was created.

I've grudgingly used C++ on some projects because of other constraints such as the target platform. Due to the compiler version, we're stuck on C++11, which is... OK. But keeping straight what we can use, and what we can't, and which kinds of pointers we should be using when is a considerable burden.

Still working through "Effective Modern C++" while learning the ins and outs of it in general.


Well, they were mostly created, because the alternatives to C and C++ ended up loosing their market share, so current generations aren't usually aware of what came before.

Go is anything hardly new versus what Algol 68, Pascal or Oberon derivative would offer.

Likewise the best part of Rust is their work on how to make affine types from Cyclone, ATS and others into more developer friendly and productive language features, while following the traditional rules of other safe systems languages.

Since it is easier to introduce new languages than bring back old ones, here we are.


Windows NT4 was "peak stability" in my experience.

Although some have said that Windows 2000 was more stable, I found the fusion of 95/98 into the NT kernel made it less so.


As a software developer and manager of software development projects, I wouldn't say that software quality has increased significantly since I started working professionally in the industry (1997).

As mentioned elsewhere, web apps frequently "crash" (ie. fatal JS error) and have strange behavior.

And those bugs are often platform/browser/version-specific so very difficult to fix.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: