Agreed

https://sharemygit.com/ let's you share forgejo repos privately through read-only share links for those that need an alternative to the github gitshare fei

Why not Gitea mind me asking? Anything in particular?

Last I looked, Forgejo had more activity and more contributors than Gitea. Also, Forgejo eats its own dogfood: Codeberg runs on it, and hosts it, while Gitea runs on GitHub.

It’s easy to make the case that Forgejo is good enough for public hosting. Gitea probably is, too, but there’s less direct evidence.

gitea runs on github u mean the source or the hosting?

Gitea uses GitHub to host the Gitea source code.

In contrast, Forgejo hosts its code on Codeberg, and Codeberg is running the Forgejo software.

Dont see a problem with hosting gitea on github and codeberg I dislike for numerous reasons.

Can u tell me what this is about?

I liked the story as told here in Science: https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabricatio...

The amyloid hypothesis and associated fraud covered in the TFA.

Yep, shilling and paid advertisement mascerading as posts espegially on ai

really hilarious the irony, i agree

This is why people shouls use gitea. I dont understand why people keep using github at this point. Its not like theyve stolen all our data or anything:))

Doesn’t this justify smoking then? Have u heard of the bhutanese saying?

Yes, you are correct.

Yes, agree, but I placed the message in the email subject so u have to see it

Sharing a private Gitea or Forgejo repo with someone outside your team is horrible.

You either make it public or go through the whole collaborator invite this wait for accept flow.

I built ShareMyGit to fix that: Get a read-only shareable link, no account needed for the viewer. Would love feedback from the self-hosted Git community.

For the first 50 users use the code EARLYBIRD to get 100% off :D