Thank god I bought the alphabet before learning it unlike one of those stealing heathens.

In your hate of AI please don't build the world in The Right to Read.

And this is why I'm glad we don't have full continuous learning AGI at this point. Humanity is not ready. We neither have the legal system nor the responsibility of handling something that would be capable of agency when turned on.

>The model is fully cooked and will never do more then pattern recognition.

The correct answer to this is "Thank fucking god".

Humanity as a whole is not ready for continuous learning models. They'd either learn very fast and actually place people at their jobs and cause mass hardships for humans, or they'd go off the alignment rails really fast and cause mass hardships for humans.

Hopefully we'll get a nice steady onramp to continuous learning where we can iron these issues out.

Yep, in an anon free internet if you can get a bot running it's worth even more than on the anon internet because you know exactly who the data belongs to that your capturing, and you can attempt to directly influence known people.

This and the myriad of poor people that exist will have financial incentives to sell their identity to groups that will run bots behind them.

This is pretty much a given anyway. Making reverse engineering tools is already likely to get you sued by someone so model makers are apt to slow down the ability of their tools to reverse engineer to avoid the lawsuits themselves.

Heh finally the impunity of the NSA is good for once. Good luck suing them over Ghidra

And other people are judging your comment as dumb and somewhat misunderstanding of genetics/fitness.

I mean, living in a garbage dump is possible, millions of of people do it around the world.

The problem as a country you are doing to disappear demographically if you're choices are near suffering versus having kids.

It's possible, but if you do it in a developed country they'd take you to jail. Just like the law imposed a minimum wage, it also imposed a mandatory minimum standard of living.

Because it will be very messy and involve a lot of suffering if unmanaged.

The population just doesn't disappear, it can pretty quickly shrink in just a generation or two leaving huge amounts of infrastructure unmaintained and falling apart with huge amounts of debt that will ensure what remains of society ends up in chaos.

That and the most likely part of the population to shrink is the ones we consider more stable and rational. Cults and religious breeding groups will increasing become the majority of the population leading to some 'interesting fun times'.

> most of that super detailed documentation is AI-generated, so there be dragons.

You can somewhat automatically test this by having some other AI agent/model read your docs and successfully implement it.

Adding to this, if an LLM can't get the right answer from your docs, its your docs that are bad.

Nah, it's also just as well the LLM that's not smart enough/hallucinates.

You can see it often reading the code wrongly (and the code is the canonical description of the program, no room for interpretation). Or inventing non-existent APIs. Or not being able to count the "r" in bluberries.

And suddenly, the only way for it to get the wrong idea from your docs is the docs themselves being bad?