Doesn’t want to talk to the media because she “wants to protect her mental health.”
Kicks off a media shitstorm by refusing to talk to the media. Risks tens of thousands in fines, a WTA investigation, default from the French Open, and expulsion from future Grand Slam events.
Please don't be snarky or post shallow dismissals to HN, and if you'd please stop posting flamebait and/or unsubstantive comments generally, we'd be grateful.
Edit: while I have you, could you please stop creating accounts for every few comments you post? We ban accounts that do that. This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
You needn't use your real name, of course, but for HN to be a community, users need some identity for other users to relate to. Otherwise we may as well have no usernames and no community, and that would be a different kind of forum. https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...
It’s not artificial scarcity, it’s outright fake scarcity.
The total supply of Bitcoin is 21,000,000 coins. However, every single coin is 100,000,000 individual assets.
21,000,000 sounds pretty finite. But 21,000,000,000,000,000 sounds a tad less finite. The price of Bitcoin relies on the fundamental false premise that it’s scarce.
"stacking sats" is a common phrase so it's not really a secret that a bitcoin can be subdivided. In fact, a lot of bitcoin supports would support people learning this fact.
There is nothing special or important about a single entire Bitcoin. It’s completely arbitrary. The question is whether Bitcoin is scarce. If there are millions of trillions of tradeable assets, it’s not scarce.
If most of it is locked in someone else’s account and they won’t sell it to you: it is scarce. If nobody wants to buy it: it’s not scarce. Scarcity is based on supply and demand, not on a single number.
That's like saying pizza isnt scarce because you can cut one into 1000 tiny slices. Or gold isnt scarce because you can cut 1 bar into 1 tiny million pieces. Pretty hilarious misconception
Except pizza and gold both have fundemental value as you decrease the size. Bitcoin has exactly the same techinical functionality regardless of the size.
Using a toilet without a bidet is the equivalent to stepping barefoot into dog crap, the crap gets all in between your toes, and then you use dry paper towels to clean off.
Stop posting your life and thoughts on the internet! Privacy advocates have been screaming about this for years but no one seems to care until they have a gun in their face.
The really sad thing is the children. Parents uploading their kids entire lives and the kids have absolutely no way to opt out. Permanently giving your kid an online identity before they can even talk. Horrible thing to do to your child.
The biggest problem I have with Amazon is USPS theft. I have had dozens of packages delivered in my mailbox despite the fact that my mailbox is 3” tall. Amazon doesn’t care, USPS doesn’t care. But Amazon always make me wait at least a week to verify that this obvious theft is real. Photo evidence of my mailbox does not move the needle.
That's interesting, maybe it's different per country or perhaps even city/region? The two times I've ever returned something, I had to put a little printed barcode thing into the box with the returned item. Just did this a couple months ago.
Borrowing rates are just too low, and banks are letting people and businesses lever up way beyond reasonable levels.
Short term rentals are lucrative. Owners can earn many multiples of their costs per month on the short term rental market. Significantly more lucrative than traditional long term rental properties.
...and finally, the ridiculous bonus depreciation rules.
Borrow at low rates, secure cash flow into the future, and write off 100% of eligible improvements the year you spend. Yeah, no shit the housing market is going ballistic.
I think where people get into trouble is when they try to implement a true microservice architecture without actually understanding the tradeoffs and complexities. You will likely end up with a spaghetti rube goldberg mess with weird service dependencies.
I also think people tend to strive for too much purity. It's okay if you want to avoid the replication and event bus complexity of microservices and choose a monolith-esque database architecture. Just split your APIs across business domain, leave your database as it is, and be done with it.
Just make sure you stick to the fundamental principles of microservices. Scoped, fault tolerant, independently deployable. Fault tolerant does not 100% have to include database failures. Don't ever directly cascade API calls from one service to another.
The biggest "why not" is that you should choose the architecture that best solves the problem. Don't treat architecture as a playground to try out random shit. Solve the business problem in the simplest way possible. In most scenarios you probably don't need isolated, fault tolerant, distributed services. I would guess that 75% of microservices implementations fall under the premature optimization anti-pattern.
Kicks off a media shitstorm by refusing to talk to the media. Risks tens of thousands in fines, a WTA investigation, default from the French Open, and expulsion from future Grand Slam events.
I’m sure all that is great for her mental health.