> If we could ignore the CDDL conditions, then the problems would go away.
That's a strange way to say relicensing CDDL code under GPL
> A license incompatibility happens when two licenses has each some conditions which are incompatible with each other,
I think it's a bit of a far stretch to say that both licenses are to blame when one license has a so far reaching condition that other code needs to be relicensable under that license.
Any Covered Software that You distribute or otherwise make available in Executable form must also be made available in Source Code form and that Source Code form must be distributed only under the terms of this License. The Modifications that You create or to which You contribute are governed by the terms of this License.
Which license require that other code needs to be relicensable under its license? this license really means, this license. Modified code is required to be under, and I will repeat myself here, this license. If source code is not under this license, then it is infringing on this license condition and this license will no longer permit redistribution.
This license has a condition, and this license condition makes it incompatible with every other license that has an identical condition.
That's a strange way to say relicensing CDDL code under GPL
> A license incompatibility happens when two licenses has each some conditions which are incompatible with each other,
I think it's a bit of a far stretch to say that both licenses are to blame when one license has a so far reaching condition that other code needs to be relicensable under that license.