Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
SamReidHughes
on Oct 14, 2019
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Show HN: Bel
I never claimed it was a formal specification. The question was, is the meaning of (a b . c) defined, and the answer is, yes, because (b . c) is a list.
nilkn
on Oct 14, 2019
[–]
And I say the answer is no, because (b . c) is an arbitrary pair, not a list. It would appear that we’re at an impasse.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: