Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But they didn't actually get the $700 they refunded it, along with spending who knows how many support hours along the way.

Maybe there enough people out there who don't notice a $700 overage to offset that, but it seems like there would at least be a visible decrease in support costs if they had a better system.



I suspect that full refunds for user mistakes aren't entirely typical.

Not everyone has a high spend account and a rep who brags about their policy of refunding mistakes frequently enough to snipe them with "If you have a policy of refunding mistakes, then why didn't you?" in front of customers.

I would like to emphasize that I've chosen my words carefully: I don't know for certain that the rep intervened, but I made trouble, emailed him the information necessary to resolve my issue, and then my half refund became a full refund. Any connection between these dots is pure speculation on my part.


> user mistakes

The first 2 points in GP's post were Amazon's bugs. It's not a user mistake if the user fails to fix the vendor's bugs.


I am GP. I agree, of course, but when a company wants to blame the user, it usually finds a way.


Part of retail sales is people not caring enough to spend the energy to return / get a refund. Even if this story resulted in a refund, there are probably 100 other who didn't bother because it wasn't worth their time.


Wild guess.. refunds happen in separate department, and do not affect his/hers KPI.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: