>The problem is how Google buries ozonetel.com below everything else. It should be absolutely fine if Google puts Ozonetel as first search result(because there is a brand and company called Ozonetel), and then puts the ads below that.
Sure, and I want to watch a show and then have all of the commercials run at then end after I turn off the TV.
>More generally: if I search for "apple", what should the first result be? Wikipedia or Apple.com?
"if I search for "apple", what should the first result be? Wikipedia or Apple.com?"
Apple is a common noun in the English language. So I would assume the first result to be Wikipedia or some site which gives the best details about apples. The second result could be Apple.com or whoever has applied for the keyword.
Thank you for answering. But that is inconsistent with what you said about your brand appearing first before any ads. In Apple’s case, are competitors allowed to bid on this keyword, since it is a common noun in English? Why or why not? I assume your brand is not a common word in the English language but what if it is in another language? As you can see, I can continue muddying the waters until it’s not so trivial to make a decision on these things — especially automatically.
Sure, and I want to watch a show and then have all of the commercials run at then end after I turn off the TV.
>More generally: if I search for "apple", what should the first result be? Wikipedia or Apple.com?
So what would your answer to this be?