I just thought: if fusion makes heavier elements, it makes sense that the universe expands faster... And I don't even know how I got there...
fusion makes elements heavier.
Heavier collections of elements make more gravity.
(is the creation of matter limited in our universe?)
In bucket with limited supply of new matter, through fusion the existing matter makes clumps which get heavier and heavier. But the substrate will thin everywhere else.
Supermassive black holes make more gravity.
The more compression there is, the more heat is generated,
And matter switches state at some point. (solid -> gaseous -> plasma -> another step -> another step?)
If the matter "becomes" dark energy as a new sort of state, it could get "flung" out like two electrons with the same poles.
Since Energy doesn't get lost, there's no other way than to "collect" at the fringes of the universe
If the universe was like a baloon in the universe it would push the boundaries of the bucket indefinitely.
Gravity is kinda like our substrate, not sure if fish are aware about their water being "heavier or less heavy", not sure if this analogy will ever hold up...
can someone let me know if I got some of it right?
First of all, while fusion makes elements heavier, gravity does not increase this way, since the total energy of the system remains constant, and E=mc^2. It could be that the radius the mass/energy is contained in does decrease, but not all stars end up as black holes, while ack holes have no more or less gravity than any other object with the same mass/energy.
Then, most of your explanation is carried by the solid -> liquid -> gas -> plasma ->... -> dark energy idea, which makes no sense. Dark energy is not matter - none of the observations are consistent with any kind of matter in intergalactic space. And matter of any kind will always have gravity, so it can't be responsible for the expansion of space time.
unless it goes from matter to something else (like two particles with oposite poles) when being cooked up inside the black that tries to get away from each other
Matter inside a black hole, by definition, can never leave the are of the black hole. The shape of space beyond the event horizon is simply such that there is no path outside.
And there is no 'something else' beyond matter, except energy, which is not a thing per se, but the potential for other things to move or happen.
They emit Hawking radiation from the event horizon itself, not from the area inside the event horizon. As far as it is theorized, they shrink by emitting this radiation. This phenomenon is poorly understood and likely impossible to study, at least until we have a quantum account of gravity. But what is clear is that a particle that has crossed the event horizon will never again cross it back, the very geometry of space prevents this.
fusion makes elements heavier.
Heavier collections of elements make more gravity.
(is the creation of matter limited in our universe?) In bucket with limited supply of new matter, through fusion the existing matter makes clumps which get heavier and heavier. But the substrate will thin everywhere else.
Supermassive black holes make more gravity.
The more compression there is, the more heat is generated,
And matter switches state at some point. (solid -> gaseous -> plasma -> another step -> another step?)
If the matter "becomes" dark energy as a new sort of state, it could get "flung" out like two electrons with the same poles.
Since Energy doesn't get lost, there's no other way than to "collect" at the fringes of the universe
If the universe was like a baloon in the universe it would push the boundaries of the bucket indefinitely.
Gravity is kinda like our substrate, not sure if fish are aware about their water being "heavier or less heavy", not sure if this analogy will ever hold up...
can someone let me know if I got some of it right?