It was clearly a joke. A questionable study ended up having a result from a google/twitter search of the same name made for a humorous reference. Did you take the same racist conclusion from the photo of the guy who had the 7 month PhD? This is a blog entry, not a professional scholarly work, and so it was written to be enjoyed.
> Did you take the same racist conclusion from the photo of the guy who had the 7 month PhD?
No, because the quip there wasn't based upon the person's name (which originates from their culture) and a stereotype about their place of origin. It's amazing how context is important.
The seizure was in the US, despite being a Hispanic name. I don’t understand why you’re jumping to conclusions about place of origin. It’s easy to imagine the name could have been Smith and the same content could have been written and fit right in.
Please don’t be snarky about context — not only is it against HN guidelines, it’s not giving full faith to me or anyone else who might read this and the blog entry in its entirety.
