Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I expected more mentions of Vitess, which honestly looks like some kind of alien black magic from what I saw while consulting for a client this year.

But I guess not much else happened to it other than PlanetScale.



Which part most impressed you and which part seems like magic? Their devs / contributors are active on here...


edit: not sure why the downvotes (-3 so far) since I just stated my experience on the project. There must be something blatantly wrong in what I wrote and I would appreciate criticism.

    --------
An architect demoed the failure of a shard and the automatic promotion of its backup shard to main, in production. They actually test their failure models.

As I see it, sharding is not very hard. HA is not very hard given a reasonable SLA. But sharding with HA on a large setup that actually works is pretty hard.

Another thing that stuck in my mind was their high throughput-per-provisioned-hardware ratio. With not much hardware they were pulling 80k queries per second with room to spare.

Although I have to say, that's not much compared to GitHub which pulls 1.2 million queries/sec on Vitess [0].

[0] https://github.blog/2021-09-27-partitioning-githubs-relation...


I think its more about the HN community not wanting to hear that anything other than Postgres works.


I would love to use Vitess, but it doesn’t support Postgres at the moment. And that’s a non-starter unfortunately.


All major companies are moving to Vitess. The battle is over. No one at scale uses Postgres.


Any reference for this?





Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: