Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Superstition.

There are many "SEO experts" who swear that the opposite is true (which goes to show you the value of "SEO experts," but I digress.)

Seriously...this is web-crawler 101. I think the search engines have it covered.



Duplicate pages are bad. They cause a split in pagerank. Discount advice of anyone who tells you otherwise.

http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/duplicate-content-question/


I have a feeling the page rank of change.gov will be just fine, even if some googler has to hard code it.


I doubt they'll need hard code. This is a big new thing. I'm sure there'll be hella linking to this from around the Internet.

I posted the URL on Tumblr a few hours ago and already had 7 people reblog the link. That's one isolated instance. This'll be passed on quickly.


Yes, duplicate pages are generally bad, but nobody has demonstrated that having a www domain results in duplicate pages. It's a superstition.

I've the done tests myself, and never found a difference. The link you've provided suggests much the same thing -- as long as you're being reasonable in your use of subdomains, you're not going to be penalized by the search engines.


It does. If you run a site, open up Google Webmaster console or Yahoo's Search Explorer and see for yourself.


I've done exactly that, and never found a difference.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: