Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The FCC sent them a strongly worded letter in March, giving then a new deadline in April. Roughly seven months later, the FCC is finally starting enforcement procedures.

To me, they’re trying to avoid any and all accusations that they’re moving unfairly quickly or terminating access without appropriate consideration if people missed the notice or needed more time to respond.



Pretty sure most Americans would support the FCC taking swift retributive action the very first day it was legal. These companies didn't just accidentally miss the notice. They have been active in profiting off of fraud for years and know exactly what they are doing.


Either that or they’re small shops that are running some open source software, and don’t have the chops to update their stuff.


This is the worst excuse ever. "We're hosting, routing, and otherwise supporting spam/scam calls because of our open source ethos."


That's generally how regulations work. Which means they're always getting screamed at from two sides: one who thinks they're going too slowly, and the other who thinks they're abusive for doing anything at all.


What I would do is I would simply open a new company every time the old company is shut down.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: