>payment processors as paid content censor system is absurd
So you don't like it when payment processors blacklist sexual content. What about racist content? Are you fine with someone selling a game mod that for example replaces all people of color in a game with people of European ancestry using something like Stripe?
It actually shocks me that anyone thinks that's supposed to be an obvious case for rejection of the concept, we've had similar for free for the longest time.
Being able to sell such stuff incentives higher quality, doesn't it? It takes a serious amount of work to dig through all of Baldurs Gate, for example.
That's kinda how it works in Germany and many other European countries. Thinking of RAC bands like Landser. Mein Kampf is now legal as long as it comes with a commentary. The game mod I've mentioned, not sure if it would go through. Depends on the details, I guess
My example includes none of that. It's clear this duopoly system doesn't work as far as content filtering. Nothing about being a payment processor makes them good at evaluating companies, the individual bits of content they provide, and being a gatekeeper.
I trust itchio to decide for themselves what kinds of content they want to host - I don’t like seeing Stripe/Paypal try to blackmail them into censorship.
So you don't like it when payment processors blacklist sexual content. What about racist content? Are you fine with someone selling a game mod that for example replaces all people of color in a game with people of European ancestry using something like Stripe?