Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If I'm going to switch from Gmail, and bother with the switch, I'm going to make sure it's for one that's damn secure. I do want to move away from Gmail, too, but only because I know Google will never offer end-to-end security to Gmail. Most, if not all of the ones you mentioned won't either.

So I'll just wait a little longer, until something like Mailpile or some other usable e-mail service using DarkMail protocol or something better comes along, before I switch.

Do I think Gmail's UI could use a major overhaul? Sure. But I'm not going to switch because of that, after using it for years. But as I said, I would switch for something more secure.

Outlook would be the last e-mail service I'd ever switch to. They even gave NSA pre-encryption Outlook data [1], according to Snowden's leaks. That's beyond unacceptable, especially when they promise their users "security and privacy". Security and privacy are obviously just a joke to Microsoft, that's only useful to them in TV ads.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-c...

Here are the more important bits about Outlook:

> Outlook.com encryption unlocked even before official launch

> Microsoft helped the NSA to circumvent its encryption to address concerns that the agency would be unable to intercept web chats on the new Outlook.com portal

> The agency already had pre-encryption stage access to email on Outlook.com, including Hotmail;

> Microsoft also worked with the FBI's Data Intercept Unit to "understand" potential issues with a feature in Outlook.com that allows users to create email aliases

> Within five months, the documents explain, Microsoft and the FBI had come up with a solution that allowed the NSA to circumvent encryption on Outlook.com chats



"End to end" security doesn't exist so long as you're using webmail.

You want end to end security, use GPG. Otherwise accept that your email just isn't that interesting in the first place (or that you expect rule of law to prevent it's disclosure).


> Outlook.com encryption unlocked even before official launch [...]

Just like everyone else - the only reason we know about Microsoft is because that information was leaked. The only way to break from that is to run your own SMTP server and have all your friends run their own SMTP server.

Thinking that those argument can be used as a deciding point between different webmail/email providers is either insane or ignorant (unless said provider resides somewhere like Russia, on an oil rig or in space). Snowden already leaked documents indicating the NSA completely compromised the Google network[1].

The only way to securely communicate over the internet is with something such as IM with a technology like OTR Messaging[2]. You are lying to yourself if you think anyone else has the remote semblance of secure.

[1]: http://rt.com/usa/nsa-secretly-access-yahoo-google-982/ [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-the-Record_Messaging




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: